



A practical guide to working with OEMs on SMT line customization: define scope, align Hermes/CFX data, run FAT/SAT, and plan traceability and support parts now.
You’re not buying “a pick-and-place machine.” You’re buying a whole line that has to run Monday morning, with real boards, real operators, and real pressure. And if you don’t line up the OEM-производители early, you’ll end up with a Franken-line. It kind of runs, but it never feels stable.
Start with scope. Not hardware.
When people say “OEM,” they often mean the big machine brand. In SMT line customization, OEM scope is wider. It includes:
Here’s the truth: if you don’t define who owns what, you’ll get gaps. Those gaps become downtime.
Practical tip: write a one-page “ownership map.” Keep it simple. “Who configures barcode rules?” “Who sets downtime reason codes?” “Who updates recipes when BOM changes?” If you can’t answer in one sentence, you’ve found a risk.
Mixed-brand lines are normal. So you need a clean handshake between machines, plus a clean data path up to your systems.
If you’re running modern equipment, you’ll hear about Hermes for board transfer communication. If you have older gear, you’ll still hear SMEMA. You don’t have to panic. You just need a plan:
Don’t accept “it supports it” as proof. Ask for a demo with your panel size, your cycle time, and your worst-case queue.
A custom line isn’t only about moving PCBs. It’s also about moving information. If you want quick root-cause work, you need structured data from each process step.
Set expectations like:
If the OEM says, “We can export a CSV,” that’s not a system. That’s a cry for help.

Customization breaks down fast when engineering data gets messy.
Your OEM collaboration should cover these items as one connected flow:
Here’s a real-world scene: you change one capacitor vendor. Same value, different package height. The printer is fine. Placement starts dropping parts. AOI starts flagging shifts. People argue for two days. This is why you lock down package data and revision rules with the OEM up front.
Also, agree on a “golden build.” One golden board run, fully documented. Same recipe, same feeders, same settings. When things go weird later, you can compare to something real, not “I think it was better last month.”
Traceability sounds boring until you need it. Then it becomes your best friend.
Don’t start with “trace everything.” Start with risk and need:
Keep the dataset small at first. But make it consistent.
A solid “minimum trace pack” often includes:
If your OEM can’t align with this, your “smart factory” dream turns into tribal knowledge. And tribal knowledge quits on Friday.
Custom lines need testable promises. That’s what FAT and SAT are for.
FAT happens at the OEM site (or before shipment). You check:
SAT happens at your plant. You confirm:
One small rule: write pass/fail criteria like a checklist, not like a story. If you can’t measure it, you can’t accept it.

If you want fewer arguments, use shared metrics. OEE is common because it forces one language:
You don’t need perfect OEE math on day one. You do need shared definitions.
Now let’s talk about the stuff people forget. This part hurts, because it’s so normal.
SMT lines don’t live in a vacuum. You need line-side storage, protection, and handling that keeps flow smooth:
This is where your manufacturing partner matters. A lot.
If you run refrigeration units, cold rooms, or test chambers, you’ll need solid physical parts that don’t rattle apart. That includes baskets, guards, and mesh that fit right the first time. Bad fit means vibration. Vibration means callbacks. It’s annoying.
This is the bridge to your site, and it’s a real one.
Two examples from your catalog that fit industrial use cases:
And yeah, sometimes the grammar in real factories isn’t perfect either. People say, “Just make it fit, ok?” But the work still has to be tight. So you keep drawings clean, revisions controlled, and communication fast. That’s how you avoid scrap and rework loops, even when the line is moving quick.

| Phase | What you align with OEMs | Proof you request | Common pain point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concept | scope + ownership map | signed scope sheet | “not my problem” gaps |
| Engineering | interfaces + data plan | interface test report | handoff glitches |
| NPI | golden build + revision rules | golden run records | mystery drift after changes |
| Acceptance | FAT/SAT criteria | pass/fail checklist | vague promises |
| Рампа | OEE + downtime codes | weekly loss review | arguing instead of fixing |
OEM collaboration isn’t about being polite. It’s about being clear. You can still customize your SMT line. You just make the customization measurable, testable, and supported.
Do that, and your line won’t feel like a science project. It’ll feel like production. And that’s the whole point, right?